What do barbie dolls and the Heritage Foundation have in common? Barbie dolls are to sexism as the heritage foundation is to racism — they both used to be bastions of each ideology but today they appear increasingly useless and irrelevant.
The Atlantic Wire reports that the Heritage Foundation is running for cover as the facts come out about one Jason Richwine, a former Harvard student who wrote his Ph.D. thesis exploring the presumed intellectual inferiority of Hispanics in America. The Heritage Foundation used the controversial Harvard former student to publish a recent report arguing about the so called costs of immigration for America.
The Heritage Foundation is a conservative think tank born in the aftermath of the Nixon era when America saw itself through the eyes of a popular media, government and academia largely of European ancestry and xenophobia towards all things not “White” or of European origin. This world view was forged at a time when civil rights at home and Vietnam abroad crushed the former American dream which was forged in a 1950s America which was being torn asunder by hippie kids and non-White civil rights marchers.
Today the modern expression of these reactionary movements are anti immigration, states rights and anti affirmative action diatribes that fly in the face of the facts of an America that needs every once of talent and muscle from its growing “brown majority.”
Recent demographic reports show that Rodriguez is now the most numerous last name held by new born babies in our country. Tomorrow is here and the Heritage Foundation seems to be trying to cover the overwhelming historical truth with an increasingly ineffective ideological argument about the size of a broken barbie doll umbrella.
“Jason Richwine, co-author of a controversial report from the Heritage Foundation that criticized the potential cost of immigration reform, has resigned from the organization. The resignation follows revelations that Richwine’s college dissertation argued that …”
via Heritage Foundation Cuts Ties to Jason Richwine – Philip Bump – The Atlantic Wire.
Filed under: Blogosphere, Culture Think, Demographic Change, Discrimination, ethnicity in politics, ideology, Immigration, Intolerance, Latinos, New Electorate, News, propaganda and spin, symbolic uses of politics, symbols as swords, WeSeeReason, Heritage Foundation, ideology, National Identity; voodoo economics; The Republican Play Book; the race card; racism; ethnocentrism; bigotry; cultural competence; haters, Racism













May 18, 2013 • 8:13 am 0
Manager Uses Urban Dictionary to Defend UFC Fighter’s Gay Twitter Slur — What would Oscar Wilde and George Orwell say?
Educational attainment, the schools we attend, the neighborhoods we grow up in, and the family that shapes us, all represent the context which gives our language meaning, its connotations. But the dictionary and the official meanings in it is an important shared frame of reference; or is it? In search of meaning, intentions and aggression, we often find ourselves in front of the proverbial mirror of shame. There always seems to be plenty of blame to go around when people are mean to one another. But to complain about UFC culture seems to go beyond reason to a place where words or meaning may no longer hold much substance.
Life in today’s diverse America is becoming quite interesting and the language to explain it increasingly seems to fall short. Public behavior, especially public behavior tied to corporate profits and corporate values, has ramifications beyond colloquialisms and local vernacular. Because the spoken word is usually magnified and made more powerful when it is repeated by those who have the means, people who speak to the wrong person (s) or in the wrong place, or at the wrong time, get crucified. Someone is always ready to listen and to register a complain for all the good people to weigh in and render a collective judgement. What passes for conversation, if inelegant or far from eloquent, in the confines of comrades and buddies in local corners or man caves, can be quite the consternation in a public setting–even when it is said in a spectacle of violence, and mostly indecency, displayed for the public palate. Apparently it is ok to beat another human being nearly to death but it is not okay to call them names? What ever happened to sticks and stones will break my bones, etc., etc. etc. We have reached the day when the tongue is mightier than the sword and the public sense of decency is measured by what Oscar Wilde himself may have seen as ironic and inane.
Tell us here at The Policy ThinkShop what you THINK???
“UFC fighter Nate Diaz (above) was suspended by the mixed martial arts body on Thursday night for earlier in the week using a gay slur against another fighter. That’s typically where a manager or someone else would step in and get the athlete to apologize and …”
via Manager Uses Urban Dictionary to Defend UFC Fighter’s Gay Twitter Slur.
Rate this:
Share this Policy Think Shop Resource:
Like this:
Filed under: News, Public Policy, Discrimination, Civic Engagement, Racism, Blogosphere, Literature & Literati, Intolerance, Demographic Change, WeSeeReason, Mass Media and Public Opinion, social protests, symbolic uses of politics, symbols as swords, Parenting, consumers, regulations, ideology, Culture Think, Changing Media Paradigm, Language, Sports, Policy ThinkShop Comments on other media platforms, Minority Males, The Audacity of Reason:, Political Facts and Fiction, Racism, discrimination, sexism; heterosexism; gender politics; feminism; old boy network; patriarchy;, homophobia; homophobic; Not funny!; Don't make fun of me!; Curb your passion with compassion;, class warfare, sexism, classism, elitism, violence, sports and violence, violent spectacles